Skip to main content

Azure architecture that runs in production, and holds up to an audit.

Independent Microsoft Azure delivery for DACH and Benelux enterprises. We design the landing zone, run the migration, cut the bill, and hand over a platform your team can govern.

What we deliver on Azure

Azure migration and modernisation

Even when every server is ready to move, one undocumented link between two systems can hold up the whole move. It surfaces late, after the switch-over date is booked.

  • Migration at scale: we have moved 1,000+ servers and 300+ applications to Azure across multiple datacentres.
  • A recovery path when a move is already at risk. We took a national airline’s stalled datacentre-to-cloud migration onto a site-reliability-engineering (SRE) model and brought it back on track.
  • Dependency mapping and a cutover sequence agreed before anything moves.

Azure landing zone and governance

Set up your Azure foundation by hand and it drifts within weeks. New projects get spun up outside the rules, and you find the gaps when an auditor does, not before.

  • A hub-and-spoke landing zone with the infrastructure defined as code in Terraform, 85% of it on the last build.
  • Governance measured against the CIS security benchmark and held there by the policy set. We have taken subscriptions to 94%.
  • Governance enforced in code, not described in a slide.

Cloud networking and connectivity

Run part of a system on-premises and part in Azure, and the link between them becomes the weak point: delay you cannot tune away and failures no one can trace.

  • ExpressRoute and Azure Virtual WAN designs that keep latency under 10ms over hybrid links.
  • A network topology that production workloads can sit on.
  • The same hub-and-spoke landing zone we govern in Terraform carries the network design, so routing changes ship through the same policy pipeline as the rest of the platform.

FinOps and Azure cost optimisation

Azure bills climb quietly: machines sized too big, capacity booked and never used. By the time finance asks, the cost is built into the architecture, and no setting will bring it down.

  • Rightsizing and reserved capacity to bring the bill down. On one estate that took 34% off the three-year total cost of ownership. What yours holds depends on where the spend sits.
  • On the same work we took 22% off live spend and secured a 28% Microsoft EA discount through Reserved Instances and Hybrid Benefit.
  • A FinOps practice with automated cost monitoring, not a one-off cleanup.

Platform reliability and managed services

The first serious incident finds out whether anyone designed the recovery. With no runbook and no owner, the uptime target on paper does not hold.

  • An SRE operating model for the workloads that need it. It has held a 99.95% uptime SLA and cut mean time to recovery by 65%.
  • Up to 99.999% uptime achieved where the workload justified the design.
  • A reliability retainer, so the platform stays governed after handover.

Cloud security and identity

Security that lives outside the architecture is a checklist. A flat network lets a single compromised device on the operational-technology (OT) network reach the domain controller in one hop. Built inside the architecture, the control is enforced.

  • Zero Trust and PKI across both IT and OT, which saved one client €750k a year.
  • Entra ID and Key Vault designs built and run by engineers holding AZ-500, Microsoft’s Azure security certification.
  • A security review that maps each finding to the named control it answers to.

Power BI and Microsoft Fabric

Two dashboards disagree because the same number is defined twice, in two places, and neither is the agreed source of truth.

  • Enterprise Microsoft Fabric and Power BI architectures with governed semantic models.
  • Data integration on Azure SQL and Data Factory, built to a single source of truth.
  • A platform review that fixes the model, not just the visuals.

Governance & compliance

  • Where residency is required, your platform runs in the Germany West Central Azure region.
  • GDPR Article 44 data-transfer restrictions addressed in the architecture, not a policy note.
  • CIS compliant across subscriptions, enforced in Terraform.
  • A documented data processing agreement and sub-processor chain.
Read our governance approach

Where we sit

Between a freelancer and a large integrator.

A complex Azure and AI engagement usually narrows to two options. A freelancer gives you real depth, and no cover on the day one person is unavailable. A large integrator gives you a recognised brand and delivery cycles measured in quarters. Pavicore holds the middle: one accountable engagement from assessment to production, at a fixed-scope entry price, with the governance and continuity a freelancer cannot carry.

A freelancer

  • Real technical depth, and flexible to work with.
  • No governance capability and no continuity plan.
  • One person carries the engagement. If they drop out, it stops.

A large integrator

  • Knows the Microsoft platform, but AI often means Copilot licences and Azure credits.
  • Delivery runs through layers of project management. Every scope change becomes a change request before anyone writes code.
  • Day-rate contracts and cycles measured in quarters.

Pavicore

  • One accountable engagement from assessment to production. What we scope is what gets delivered, with no reset when the build starts.
  • Architecture first: Azure and AI as one system, with GDPR Article 44 transfers and EU AI Act classification designed in.
  • Fixed-fee assessments at a published price, creditable against the build. Delivery runs in weeks, not quarters.

Outcomes, with the number attached.

Situation, action, quantified outcome. Each reference names the sector and the number.

  • Hospitality

    A Microsoft Fabric analytics platform for a hotel group, live in 12 weeks and used by more than 100 people.

See customer references

Start with what you need to do on Azure.

A short working session to scope your Azure need and point you to the engagement that fits.